|
Shilling Groups by Reverse |
|||||
Groups |
||||||
A fairly
easy way of organising the counterfeit shillings is separating them into
groups by looking at the reverse design. The design is
made up of a number of individual punches and some
hand engraving. The groups
are likely to represent individual die cutters although some may have used
different sets of punches over time. Die links
between the groups indicates either that some workshops used dies from more
than one engraver or that dies from one engraver were used by more than one
workshop. |
Punches used for the
NW-part of shield garnish |
|
||||
|
||||||
Group A (possible forerunner to group J) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1816-1820 |
|
Q made from two punches – O and ~ |
1816 Only die A613r |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1816-20 |
|
1816-18 |
1817-20 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1816-20 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1816 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1816 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1816-20 |
|
1816 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1817 |
1816+1818-20 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1817-18 |
|
1817-18 |
1818 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1817 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1818/20 |
1819 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1818+20 |
1819 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1817-20 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
1817+1820 |
1818-19 (20) |
1819-20 (Normal variation) |
1819 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
1818 |
1817+1819 |
1817-20 (Normal variation) |
1820 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1818 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1820 |
|
|
|
|||
Group
M is hand engraved |
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||
1820 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||